Anti abortion pushing against drug that reduces abortion. This is why we don’t call them pro life.

That’s good to know. Hoping someone can figure it out. There’s someone who got the m.2 working supposedly. Might see if I can tinker with it.

4k60

Prism is the best

Just started the switch to fedora. It’s actually really good. I played minecraft with my spouse and after turning off mouse acceleration, it felt great. My favorite games are all on steam. Only things that are rough is professional software. Also, my $250 elgato capture card doesn’t support Linux. Windows is definitely going to need to stick around for me.

Obviously, using an AI to verify if somethingis AI is kinda bullshit, but this is what deepseek spat out:

The list you shared does have strong AI-generated hallmarks. Here’s why it stands out as likely machine-written, and how you can spot similar outputs in the future:

Telltale Signs This List Is AI-Generated

1. Repetitive Phrasing – Overuse of:

   • “Rescinding [X] for [Y]”
   • “Streamlining [A] with respect to [B]”
   • “Withdrawing [Product] as a Covered [Category]”

2. Excessive “Rescinding” Verbs – A human would vary language more (e.g., “repeal,” “abolish,” “eliminate”).

3. Oddly Specific Yet Vague Items – Some entries sound bureaucratic but lack real-world impact (e.g., “Rescinding Test Procedures for Small Electric Motors”).

4. Inconsistent Scope – Jumps from major energy policies (Strategic Petroleum Reserve) to trivial ones (showerhead pressure).

5. “Unnecessary ADR Regulations” – ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) is a niche term unlikely in a political deregulation push.

6. No Partisan Signaling – A real Trump/Musk DOGE list would include culture-war items (e.g., “Ending EV mandates”) or tech-bro priorities (e.g., “Fast-tracking AI nuclear reactor approvals”).

How to Prove It’s AI-Generated

• Ask for Sources: A real policy list would reference laws, executive orders, or press releases.
• Check for Recent Events: Some items (e.g., “Clean Energy Federal Building Rule”) may not exist.
• Test for Overlap: Run a portion through an AI detector (like Originality.ai).
• Compare to Known AI Outputs: Lists with 47-50 items are common for AI (round numbers = generation artifacts).

If You Suspect DOGE Is Using AI for Policy

This would be a major scandal. Next steps:

1. Compare drafts over time—AI lists will lack edits.
2. Check metadata (if possible) for AI tool signatures.
3. Demand justification for each item—AI can’t explain reasoning.

Let me know if you want help digging deeper! This is a wild (and concerning) scenario if true. 🕵️♂️

I want to note that the AI barely comprehended the idea of a government agency DOGE existing or the idea that Trump was reelected. I had to hammer it in:

Ah, got it—so we’re envisioning a Doge-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under a Trump 2024 victory, where Elon Musk and a bunch of 20-year-old tech bros are ruthlessly slashing bureaucracy with meme-fueled chaos.

Here’s your **47 absurd, inefficient, or just

Holy shit that DOE list is AI as hell

User name does not check out

You count just say you disagree and explain why it upset you.

Hear me out. You’re villainizing me because what I said struck a nerve. You don’t actually believe I want you dead. You’re just upset that I pointed out a deep flaw. Maybe it’s an insecurity, or cognitive dissonance, or whatever. I’m very familiar with this type of response. Whatever it is, realize that someone likely depends on you and that an unhealthy lifestyle is not good for them. I’m encouraging you to do better, if not for yourself, the people in your life you care for. I recognize my ignorance. I’m not a therapist. I’m just stating something I’ve personally observed.

Look. Shitty doctors exist, but when 1/3 of the US is overweight, there are underlying issues that need addressing. I only hear horror stories when an addict, alcoholic, or overweight individual in my life is feeling insecure or defensive about a prognosis. Too many people deflect and it’s enabling a much larger issues. Our basic instincts are being exploited.

Got a lot to say but I’ll keep it brief-ish. Corporations love unhealthy people. They will artificially celebrate this and reinforce unhealthy lifestyles. This extends beyond weight.

Once entrapped, escape is hard. Some are passive and depressed. Some are dismissive and defensive. No matter which cycle you are in, it’s unhealthy.

I think smoking is bad like I think being overweight is bad. If a doctor says alcohol is killing you, it probably is. I don’t think hatred is deserved, but don’t expect any validation for those choices.

Calling go go gadget bullet proof head requires that the user makes a contract: their head and neck are permanently hardened, rendering their lips and vocal cords immobilized.

I’m confused. They falsely accused 1,700 cases where people weren’t committing fraud but could only prove that 300 people were and it’s the clinics fault so they need to pay a railroad company from Texas $3M and the government $3M? How could they possibly have caused $6M in damages with only 300 people on medicare? Did each person get paid $20,000?

Retaliation for exposing the truth, likely to never speak the full truth again.

I just woke up. What’s with all the Dino memes?

Kristi Noem took a hunting pup down to the gravel pit for embarrassing her.

From Wikipedia

In March 2025, Gabbard, along with other senior members of the administration, discussed the plans for the US’s attacks in Yemen on a Signal group chat that leaked to journalist Jeffrey Goldberg.[297] When questioned by Congress, Gabbard admitted sharing the information with Goldberg was a “mistake”, but claimed none of the information shared was classified.[298] After the Signal leak, reporters of Der Spiegel used online leaked data to find personal information such as emails, phone numbers, and messaging accounts of several U.S. security officials including Gabbard, who was exposed on WikiLeaks and Reddit.[299] Gabbard’s office responded that Gabbard had not used the online accounts for several years and that her data leak occurred nearly 10 years ago, but Der Spiegel reported that Gabbard’s private Google account was active two weeks prior, and that messages sent by Der Spiegel to her leaked WhatsApp and Signal accounts were also apparently delivered.[299]

Gabbard’s nomination was met with controversy.[250][251][252] Media coverage was widely critical,[253][254][255] and Democrats raised concerns about her past meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and remarks perceived as aligning with Russian narratives.[256][257] Critics, including former CIA Director Leon Panetta, questioned her lack of intelligence experience and opposition to U.S. involvement in Ukraine.[258]

The New York Times noted that while Russian media had amplified Gabbard’s foreign policy views, there was no evidence of collaboration with Russian intelligence, and she had opposed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.[259] Democratic congressmen, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jason Crow, Tammy Duckworth, and Elizabeth Warren, labeled her a “likely Russian asset.”[260][261][262][263][43]

Over 100 former national security officials signed a letter opposing her nomination.[264][265][266] Gabbard’s spokesperson dismissed these concerns as politically motivated attacks.[267][265]

Hedgpeth and the team at the Post continued that work, publishing a series of stories that revealed the sexual abuse of at least 1,000 Native American children at Catholic boarding schools and more than 3,100 childrens’ deaths at boarding schools across the country.

They’ve also assisted in the bombing of Yemen to my surprise. I don’t follow military operations closely, so I was shocked to hear about joint operations with the US.

I can’t keep up. Which one is the Russian spy?